Commercial
air travel
Cabin, checked baggage and manifest cargo are different services. Each needs its own assessment of eligibility, fees, preparation and handover arrangements.
Separate scope for each transport channel.
More clarity. More accountability.
A proposed quality label for air travel with dogs. Bringing together clear commitments, documented evidence and the experiences of people who travel with them.

The purpose
“Dogs welcome” is a starting point.
Knowing what happens next is what matters.
Booking conditions, handling arrangements, unexpected delays: a journey depends on much more than whether a dog is accepted.
Sky Dog Seal is being developed to make providers’ commitments easier to understand and assess. The aim is not to reward the boldest promise, but to recognise clear information, responsible procedures and accountable service.
Built on MyDogCanFly’s work documenting airline policies, the programme would connect published commitments with supporting evidence and traveller feedback.
One identity. Defined areas of assessment.
Each assessment would cover a named service, not every activity of an airline or partner. Dogs remain the programme’s sole species focus.
Cabin, checked baggage and manifest cargo are different services. Each needs its own assessment of eligibility, fees, preparation and handover arrangements.
Separate scope for each transport channel.
Accessible information, clear documentation requirements and appropriate support for disabled travellers accompanied by trained assistance dogs.
Assess the travel service. Never certify the dog or the person’s disability.
Specialist cabin travel, including options for larger dogs. Clear operating responsibilities, space, admission conditions and contingency arrangements.
A premium fare is not evidence of better care.
The proposed framework
The criteria and assessment methods are in development. Documentary checks and observed practices would be identified separately, so readers can see what was actually verified.
Weight and carrier limits, breed restrictions, routes, seasonal conditions and fees stated with their scope and charging basis.
A practical way to confirm the dog’s arrangements for the itinerary, including any operating carrier and connecting flights.
Named responsibilities and relevant procedures for preparation, handling and handovers, with attention to the dog’s welfare.
Clear procedures for heat restrictions, delays, missed connections, aircraft changes and refusals of carriage.
A contact for concerns, a complaints process and a commitment to report material changes to the assessed service.
A seal with a public record
Every awarded seal would link to a record hosted on MyDogCanFly: the assessed service, applicable criteria, evidence reviewed, limitations and review date.
An airline, charter operator or specialist partner would be assessed only for the responsibilities and services within its stated scope.
Traveller voices
Traveller feedback is planned as a complementary source of insight, not a substitute for evidence or professional assessment.
The programme would examine the provider’s information and supporting procedures against published criteria, with a clear record of the checks performed.
Structured reports would cover booking, communication, charges and handovers. They would distinguish what the traveller observed from what happened out of sight.
A popular service is not automatically a verified service. Public ratings would not override an essential unmet criterion. Feedback collection is not yet open.
For responsible providers
Participation would never purchase a favourable assessment. Advertising or referral arrangements would be disclosed and kept separate from evaluation decisions.
Clear boundaries
No. This page presents a programme in development. The final criteria, governance, reviewers and award process have not yet been established. No partnerships, endorsements or issued seals are claimed.
No. It would describe an assessment within a defined scope, not guarantee a risk-free journey or boarding for an individual dog. Airline confirmation and appropriate veterinary and destination checks would still be necessary. Accepting more dogs would not, by itself, earn a better assessment.
No. Sky Dog Seal would not replace regulatory approvals, applicable transport standards or specialist certifications. Its assistance-dog scope would assess the travel service, not determine whether a dog or handler qualifies for recognition.
Sky Dog Seal is an initiative developed by MyDogCanFly, not a separate independent regulator. The proposed assessment records and methodology would be hosted on the main website. Providers without a seal would not automatically be considered unsuitable or excluded from the flight-selection tool.